THE FALLACY OF THE TAX SYSTEM

A simple classification of spending shows why leaving our money in government’s hands leads to undesirable results. When you spend, you may spend your own money or someone else’s; and you may spend for the benefit of yourself or someone else. Combining these two pairs of alternatives gives four possible summarized in the following simple table.

On Whom Spent
Whose Money You Someone Else
Yours I II
Someone Else’s III IV

Category I in the table refers to your spending your own money on yourself. You shop in a supermarket, for example. You clearly have a strong incentive both to economize and to get as much value as you can for each dollar you do spend.
Category II refers to your spending your own money on someone else. You shop for Christmas or birthday presents. You have the same incentive to economize as in Category I but not the same incentive to get full value for your money, at least as judged by the tastes of the recipient. You will, of course, want to get something the recipient will like – provided that it also makes the right impression and does not take too much time and effort. (if, indeed, your main objective were to enable the recipient to get as much value as possible per shilling, you would give him cash, converting Category II spending to Category I spending by him.)
Category III refers to your spending someone else’s money on yourself – lunching on an expense account, for instance. You have no strong incentive to keep down the cost of the lunch, but you do have a strong incentive to get your money’s worth.
Category IV refers to your spending someone else’s money on still another person. You are paying someone else’s lunch out of an expense account. You have little incentive either to economize or try to get your guest the lunch that he will value most highly. However, if you are having lunch with him, so that the lunch is a mixture of Category III and Category IV, you do have a strong incentive to satisfy your own tastes at the sacrifice of his, if necessary.

All welfare programs fall into either Category III or Category IV.
Legislators vote to spend someone else’s money. The voters who elect the legislators are in one sense voting to spend their own money on themselves, but not in the direct sense of Category I spending. The connection between the taxes any individual pays and the spending he votes for is exceedingly loose. (Ironic how our legislators do not pay any taxes yet they are the same people who decide how tax money should be spent)

The bureaucrats spend someone else’s money on someone else. Only human kindness, not the much stronger and more dependable spur of self-interest, assures that they will spend the money in the way most beneficial to the recipients. Hence the wastefulness and ineffectiveness of the spending.
Leaving our fate in government’s hand is a big mistake! Greedy legislators (who do not pay taxes) shouldn’t be allowed to control funds taken away from hardworking Kenyans.
As the chart above indicates, the best determinant of how to spend your money is yourself. You know the difficulty of earning the money, so you will most likely spend it wisely; in a way that maximizes return (whatever maximization of return may mean to you).